

|
Contents |
The History of the Peloponnesian War is an account of the battles, conflicts, and politics of the Peloponnesian War in Ancient Greece, fought between the Peloponnesian League (led by Sparta) and the Delian League (led by Athens), written by an Athenian general who served in the war, Thucydides. It is widely considered a classic and regarded as one of the earliest scholarly works of history. Thucydides' masterpiece is divided into eight books. These book divsions are the work of editors in later antiquity.
Thucydides' History made a number of contributions to early Historiography. Many of his principles have become standard methods of history writing today, though others have not.
One of Thucydides' major innovations was to employ a strict standard of chronology, recording events by year, each year consisting of the summer campaigning season and a less active winter season. As a result, events that span several years are divided up and described in parts of the book that are sometimes quite distant from one another, causing the impression that he is oscillating wildly between the various theatres of conflict.
Another distinctive feature of the work are the dozens of speeches assigned to the principal figures engaged in the war. These include addresses given to troops by their generals before battles and numerous political speeches, both amongst Athenian and Spartan leaders and between them. Of the speeches, the most famous is the funeral oration of Pericles, which is found in Book Two. Thucydides undoubtedly heard some of these speeches himself while for others he relied on eye witness accounts. Some of the speeches are probably fabricated according to his expectations of what must have been said.
Despite being an Athenian and a participant in the conflict, Thucydides is regarded as having written a generally unbiased account of the conflict and all the sides involved in it. In the introduction to the piece he states that "My work is not a piece of writing designed to meet the taste of an immediate public, but was done to last for ever" (Book I, 22).
The gods play no role in Thucydides' work, unlike the many appearances they make in the writings of Herodotus (and their near ubiquity in Homer's work). Instead, Thucydides shows history as caused by the choices and actions of human persons.
The History concentrates on military and political matters. However, it uses these events as a medium to deal specifically with the socially and culturally degenerative effects of war on men themselves (focusing on the lawlessness and atrocities committed by Greek citizens). It largely leaves matters like art and architecture untouched. The History, for example in the Melian dialogue, describes early instances of realpolitik or power politics, as well as the breakdown of social and cultural norms under the stress of warfare.
Thucydides' History is extraordinarily dense and complex. This has resulted in much scholarly disagreement on a cluster of issues of interpretation.
The History of the Peloponnesian War is unfinished, ending in mid-sentence. It is virtually certain that Thucydides died while still working on the History. However there is greater deal of uncertainty whether Thucydides intended to revise the sections he had already written. Since there appear to be some contradictions between certain passages in the History, it has been proposed that the conflicting passages were written at different times and that Thucydides' opinion on the conflicting matter had changed. Those who argue that the History can be divided into various levels of composition are usually called analysts and those who argue that the passages must be made to reconcile with one another are called unitarians. The debate is called the strata of composition debate.
Thucydides' History has been enormously influential in modern historiography. It was embraced by Thucydides contemporaries and immediate successors with similar enthusiasm. Indeed, many authors sought to complete the unfinished history. For example, Xenophon wrote his Hellenica as a continuation of Thucydides' work, beginning at the exact moment that Thucydides' History leaves off. His work, however, is generally considered far inferior in style and accuracy compared with Thucydides'. In later antiquity, Thucydides' reputation suffered somewhat, with critics such as Dionysius of Halicarnassus rejecting the History as turgid and excessively austere. Lucian also parodies it (among others) in his wonderful satire True Histories.