

|
Plagiarism is a form of academic malpractice. It refers to the use of another's information, language, or writing, when done without proper acknowledgment of the original source. Plagiarism is not necessarily the same as copyright infringement, which occurs when one violates copyright law. Like most terms from the area of intellectual property, plagiarism is a concept of the modern age and not really applicable to medieval or ancient works.
Contents |
Plagiarism is the use of another person’s work (this could be their words, products or ideas) for personal advantage without proper acknowledgement of the original work with the intention of passing it off as your own. Plagiarism may occur deliberately (with the intention to deceive) or accidentally (due to poor referencing). It includes copying material from a book, copying-and-pasting information from the World Wide Web, getting family or friends to help with coursework – even copying answers from a fellow student during an examination is a form of plagiarism (presuming the copied work isn’t attributed). Plagiarism and cheating are not the same; cheating takes many forms including – but not limited to – deliberate plagiarism.
Plagiarism is neither a criminal nor civil offence. In fact, plagiarism is not a legal term and is not legally recognised. But breach of copyright or intellectual property rights (IPR) is illegal; if an act of plagiarism breaches copyright or IPR then it is illegal. Not every act of plagiarism is a breach of copyright. For example, you can plagiarise work that has no copyright (such as material that is out of copyright).
Self-plagiarism occurs when you copy your own writing (or products or ideas) without due attribution of the source, i.e., yourself.
There is some difference of opinion over how much credit must be given when preparing a newspaper article or historical account. Generally, reference is made to original source material as much as possible, and writers avoid taking credit for others' work. The use of mere facts, rather than works of creative expression, does not constitute plagiarism. For the latter, the issue of public domain works versus copyrighted works is irrelevant to the concept of plagiarism. For instance, it is legal for a student to copy several paragraphs (or even pages) of text from a public domain book, such as Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, and then directly add this text to his or her own paper. However, if this text were not clearly identified as to his or her source, then the student would be guilty of plagiarism, using another writer's work as if it were his or her own. High schools, colleges and universities are especially sensitive to plagiarism, and as a result, they have academic codes of ethics (honor codes) which prohibit plagiarism in all its forms.
Similarly, it is considered plagiarism to take the specifics of someone else's novel idea, and then present it as one's own work. This type of plagiarism frequently occurs in high schools, colleges and universities, when, for example, students use the analyses in "CliffsNotes" and falsely present them as being their own original analysis. A small market has emerged of web sites offering essays and papers for sale to students, while a counter-industry has developed of companies offering services for instructors to compare a student's papers to a database of sources and search for potential plagiarism.
Moreover, just as there can be plagiarism without lawbreaking, it's possible to violate copyright law without plagiarizing. For example, one could distribute the full text of a current bestseller on the Internet while giving clear credit for it to the original author, financially damaging the author and publisher. In this respect, the mere fact that a piece of text is not plagiarized may not suffice to justify its use.
According to some academic ethics codes and criminal laws, a complaint of plagiarism may be initiated or proven by any person. The person originating the complaint need not be the owner of the plagiarized content, nor need there be any active or passive communication from a content owner directing that any investigation or discipline process be initiated in response to the plagiarism.
It is not plagiarism when two (or more) people independently come up with the same idea or analysis. This is commonly termed simultaneous inspiration, or colloquially "great minds think alike", and comes about as the logical result of people essentially exposed to the same source material and interpreting it similarly.
There is also accidental plagiarism. One case involved a boy whose mother had repeatedly read to him a story as a very small child. Later in life he was writing a story for an assignment, and a story 'came to him', but the story turned out to be exactly that which his mother had read to him as a small child, though he had no recollection of her reading it to him.
However, due to their fear of litigation, many editors refuse to recognize any difference between either simultaneous or accidental inspiration and true plagiarism. In many academic settings intent does not even enter into it. Princeton dismisses intent as "irrelevant", and Doug Johnson says that intent is "not necessary for a work to be considered plagiaristic, and as one respondent put it 'ignorance of the law is no excuse.' which is a fallacy as plagiarism is not even legally recognized. Many Universities will even revoke a degree retroactively if an alumnus' plagiarism comes to light within a year after graduation.
According to Diana Hacker, the citation criteria as specified by the MLA (Modern Language Association) (115), APA (American Psychological Association) (157-158), Chicago-Style (186), and others (228-230): "Three different acts are considered plagiarism: (1) failing to cite quotations and borrowed ideas, (2) failing to enclose borrowed language in quotation marks, and (3) failing to put summaries and paraphrases in your own words." A Pocket Style Manual, 4h ed., 2004 Bedford/St. Martin's.
Students cite many reasons for plagiarising including: (1) being unaware that they’re plagiarising; (2) lacking knowledge and understanding of the subject; (3) poor time management skills; (4) feeling that the subject is unimportant; (5) believing that plagiarism isn’t serious; (6) feeling pressurised due to over-assessment; (7) poor teaching.
The most common reason given by students is ignorance about plagiarism – that they were unclear about the plagiarism policy and, therefore, unaware that they were doing anything wrong. A common misunderstanding among students relates to paraphrased material. Many students do not realise that paraphrased material should be attributed to the original author in the same manner as a direct quotation.
Some students do not consider plagiarism a serious offence since it does not (in their view) harm other students. Research has shown that students consider cheating in an examination to be much more serious than plagiarising coursework – even if both contribute to final grades. Some students will rationalise plagiarism – poor teaching, over-crowded classrooms, too much assessment, “irrelevant” subject content, poor health, and stress are commonly given as reasons.
Plagiarism is a problem because it is a form of cheating. Irrespective of the student’s intention, undetected plagiarism may result in the student receiving a higher grade than s/he would have received without the inclusion of the plagiarised material. The resulting (inflated) grade may be used for entrance to further education or employment – thereby deceiving entrance officers or employers into believing that the student possesses knowledge and skills that they do not. Plagiarism also holds back progress. If students and researchers simply regurgitate other people’s work then academic progress stagnates through a dearth of original work.
A less tangible problem is the corrosive effects that plagiarism has on the student body and on society in general. Once plagiarism reaches a certain level, students who would not normally plagiarise may feel that they must in order to compete with their fellow students. Undetected plagiarism may encourage cheating outside of school or college, and foster bad habits which students take into the workplace.
There is no definitive research into the frequency of plagiarism. Any research which has taken place has focussed on the Higher Education (university) sector. There are no published statistics for the school or college sectors; awarding bodies do not maintain statistics specifically on plagiarism. However, of all the different forms of cheating (which includes plagiarism, inventing data and cheating during an exam), students admit to plagiarism more than any other. Research findings range from 25% to 90% of students admitting to some form of plagiarism. However, this figure reduces considerably when students are asked about the frequency of “serious” plagiarism (such as copying most of an assignment or purchasing a complete paper from a website – more typically 20% and 10% respectively). Although research findings vary, a recurring theme is that students estimate the occurrence of plagiarism (in all its forms) higher than teaching staff, who estimate its frequency higher than Academic Standards Committees. No reliable statistics exist for the school and college sectors; awarding bodies report low occurrences of plagiarism.
[3] Sometimes, finding the plagiarists and bringing them to book is much harder: In 2003, Ian Firns of Newcastle University, visiting Wira Institute in Malaysia, determined that 15 students had plagiarised, and had failed them. He was 'let go'. But he had drawn the attention of the Australian Anti Corruption agency to a big problem, resulting in the resignation of 2 important university figures in July 2005. The problem is that many public universities(in the West), or private colleges in Asia, rely on foreign students who pay the full (local) fee and then some. It becomes so lucrative that people are willing to close their eyes to obvious cases of plagiarism, and it is in the economic interests of the universities/private colleges to graduate as many of them as possible to maintain profitability, resulting in education as a business, not a 'calling'. Plagiarism is a major problem in many private colleges and public universities througout Asia, but the best way to arrest it is to view portfolios of work done by prospective job-seekers and then compare their writing styles and fluency of the subject before hiring them.
The widespread use of the Internet has increased the incidence of plagiarism. Students are able to use search engines to locate information on a wide range of topics. Once located, this information can be cut-and-pasted into their own documents with minimal effort. The size of the Internet makes it difficult for teachers to trace the source of plagiarised material, although it is becoming easier with the advent of more sophisticated search engines such as Google.
There are also websites which provide complete essays for students to download. These websites provide a database of subject-specific topics; some provide custom-made essays on any topic (for a fee). Some of the largest fee-based term paper sites are: CustomEssay.org, CheatHouse.com, MyEssays.com, Valedictorian Essays, Tailored Essays, Go2Essay, ItchyBrainsCentral.com, Fast Papers, AcaDemon, Custom Research Papers, EssayToday, Essay Town Research Assistance, and Custom Essay Writing Service. There is also any number of sites such as SlashDOC which make all their content available for free while being supported by sponsors. Other sites (for example CustomWritten.com) try to fight against plagiarism by writing educational articles.
The Internet can also be used to combat plagiarism. Teachers can use search engines to search for parts of suspicious essays. Using search engines to check papers for plagiarism, however, is neither practical nor effective since teachers lack the time necessary to check each paper by hand using an online search engine. For this reason, many teachers have turned to plagiarism prevention services like Turnitin that automate the search process and check essays for plagiarised material by comparing each paper against millions of online sources. The techniques used in such engines are often based on variants of the Rabin-Karp string search algorithm. Despite these counteractions, some empirical evidence suggests that the overall effect of the Internet is to increase plagiarism. Oddly enough, MyEssays.com offers a free online essay scanning utility to detect plagiarism in essays available on the Internet.
It is sometimes humorously said that "copying from one source is plagiarism, copying from several sources is research". Of course, this is not literally true, because all good researchers do cite their sources. Regardless, the old maxim/joke is part of this self-defining example of this topic, having been cribbed from Tom Lehrer's 1953 song Lobachevsky: